July 25, 2016

ARMA 2016 conference approved for 18.5 CRM credits by the ICRM and 15.5 IGP credits by ARMA itself. As an aside, I counted 13.5 educational hours myself Sun-Tues which looks like "core conference". But it does make me wonder - which 3 hours of the conference does the ICRM consider educational that ARMA believes is non-educational?

Maintaining Your CIP Certification

One of the differences between formal certifications and other sorts of training/designations is the requirement to maintain them. Every certification has some sort of reexamination or continuing education requirement. This is to ensure that, as best practices, processes, and technologies change, certified professionals keep up with those changes.

The Certified Information Professional (CIP) is no exception. CIPs are required to recertify every three years. There are two ways to do this. First, CIPs can retake the CIP exam. CIPs should remember though that they will have to take the then-current exam at the then-current price.

Second, and more common, is to complete the continuing education unit (CEU) requirements. The CIP program requires that individual CIPs complete 45 CEU credits over the course of three years, or 15 credits per year. CIPs must also pay a nominal fee: $75 for AIIM Professional members, $150 for non-members, which in both cases is less than half the price of retaking the exam.

Please note that if you do not complete your CIP CEUs within the three-year certification period, you will be decertified and will have to retake the CIP exam in order to reinstate your CIP. 

What types of events count for CIP CEUs?
We've tried to make it as easy as possible to complete CEUs. It's this simple: If it's an event that meets one of the topic areas on the CIP, it counts. It doesn't matter who provides or sponsors the event - it just has to be educational and align to one of the topic areas on the CIP (2011 outline or 2016 outline). So all of these events would count for CIP CEUs:

  • Attending an AIIM Chapter meeting
  • Attending an ARMA Chapter meeting (or any other association meeting)
  • Speaking at InfoGovCon, or MER, or ARMA, or AIIM, or any other industry event
  • Attending a webinar
  • Attending a formal training course
  • Attending employee-sponsored training
  • Attending a college course, whether for credit or not
  • Developing and/or delivering a presentation
  • Publishing an article or book. A blog post might count if it's a pretty meaty post. A Tweet? Not so much. 1 credit per article or page. 
  • Attending vendor-sponsored or vendor-provided content, including product demos. Vendors have unique content to share that is incredibly valuable, even when it's very specific to their solution. 
Again, it has to align with at least one topic area on the CIP in order to qualify. And this is by no means an exhaustive list. 

Each event qualifies for 1 CEU credit per contact hour of educational content; we round down to the nearest 1/2 credit. So an AIIM preconference workshop from 9-5 would count for 6.5 hours - 8.0 hours, less 2 15-minute breaks, less 1 1-hour break for lunch - or 6.5 CEU credits. 

So what types of events would NOT qualify for CEUs?
Again, pretty simple: If it doesn't align with the CIP, it doesn't qualify. So: 
  • Attending an AIIM or ARMA chapter meeting on "How to Dress for Success" or a similarly unrelated topic
  • Employer-provided training on conflict resolution or how to drive a forklift
  • A vendor mixer/meet & greet with no educational content
  • Snack and lunch breaks during events and conferences
  • The Welcome Reception at an event or conference
  • Work experience. We just don't have any way to know how long it took you to do that thing you did or to compare it with others' work experience. 
  • A conference unrelated to the CIP. However, if a session you attend does relate, it counts. We have given credit for specific sessions at conferences on genealogy, state government, project management, and many others. 
  • Other certifications. But certification prep might count if you can document it. 
The bottom line is that if it relates to the CIP, we'll probably accept it; if it doesn't, we won't. 

How do you document and submit your credits?

List all the events you believe would qualify. For AIIM-delivered events - conference, webinars, etc. - we will confirm your registration and attendance in our systems. 

For any non-AIIM delivered events, you need to submit some sort of documentation: a registration receipt, certificate of attendance, something. We'll be flexible but we do need some sort of proof you attended what you said you did. 

You can email your credits to certification@aiim.org. You can provide your credit card number directly on the form, or request that we call you to take the credit card number over the phone. If you want to submit hard copy, pay with check, etc., mail your information to: 
AIIM
Attn: CIP Renewal
1100 Wayne Avenue, Suite 1100
Silver Spring, MD 20910

Event coordinators, submit your events for preapproval. 
Simply send an email to me at jwilkins@aiim.org or to certification@aiim.org with the name of the event, the location, date/time, and the details about the event such as a link to a web page or brochure. We generally turn those around pretty quickly so you can help market your event to CIPs. 

Note, however, that you do NOT have to get your events preapproved in order for them to be worth CIP credits; this just streamlines the process so you know what credits will be granted and helps you promote your event to CIPs as a way for them to get CEUs. 

The bottom line
Continuing education helps to ensure you're up-to-date on current processes, technologies, and best practices. It demonstrates to your employer your commitment to staying up-to-date and to your own professional growth and development. And you've passed the CIP exam, which is no small matter. Maintaining your CIP is a cost-effective way to demonstrate your professionalism and ensure that you can continue to reap the benefits of being a CIP in the future. 


I welcome your comments here or at jwilkins@aiim.org.

July 23, 2016

Activity for 7/23: 5k/3.1 mile race, walked, plus about 1 more mile walking to/from start.

July 21, 2016

Ken Treece: Despite Preservation Efforts, Company Heavily Sanctioned For Employee's Intentional Spoliation Pretty blatant behavior from a Senior VP of Sales - in other words, a senior manager who one would assume would be smart enough to realize the potential consequences (but apparently didn't care).


July 10, 2016

Activity: 3.2 mile ruck w/ 40-lb pack but normal walk/run attire. 57 minute or 17:53 pace.

July 7, 2016

FCW: Court: Feds can't hide outside emails from FOIA. Well, of course not. Much longer post on this coming from me soonish.
Nick Inglis: Understanding the Information Strategist.

I'd argue that one of the gaps not on his diagram is information governance, where there is a lot of heat and even a bit of light here and there. I find that ironic given his call-out to his own IG conference. And I have quibbles here and there. But I think that the overall corpus he describes is part and parcel of CIP, not something new. I also think that there is no one role in an organization that does all three things:

  • Sets organizational policy
  • Is "in charge" of information 
  • Coordinates between the various roles
That last is squarely where the CIP sits in my mind and in the roles and job titles of many of those that have already earned it. 

July 6, 2016

The CIP 2016 Update is LIVE!

I am pleased to announce that after a lot of hard work, some stops and starts, and with the assistance of dozens of information professionals around the world, the 2016 revision to the CIP is now LIVE.

Here's how we got here:



So what's next? Well, the exam is live, so if you're a candidate or know someone who is or should be, you can:


Already a CIP? Nothing changes for you - you do NOT need to take the revised CIP to maintain your CIP status. Provided, of course, that you complete your 45 CEUs within the 3 years after you were certified and pay the CEU fees. If you did not do that within 3 years, your CIP has expired and you do in fact need to take it again.

I can't tell you how excited I am about this relaunch. I believe that this revision has made the CIP a stronger, better-written, more useful exam and that it will continue to grow into the premier information management designation in the industry.

Questions or comments? Feel free to comment here or ping me directly at jwilkins@aiim.org.

The CIP 2016 Passing Score

Over the long weekend we notified all the CIP 2016 beta candidates as to their total scores, their individual domain scores, and whether they passed or failed. I heard from a few beta testers that a 60% passing score seems quite low, and why are we making the test easier, and won't that compromise the overall perception and quality of the CIP?

One of the key steps in the development of any certification is setting the passing score. There is a widespread misconception that the passing score "should be" a certain score such as 70% - 75%. This is akin to setting the retention for some or all of your records at 7 years: Nobody really knows how they got there, and it's not defensible, but everyone else is doing it so it must be OK.

In order for a passing score to be defensible, it needs to be criterion-based. This is typically done through some sort of standard-setting study. There are a number of ways to do this; a common way used for certification exams is modified Angoff scoring.

The way Angoff scoring works is that subject matter experts, who themselves are representative of the target audience, take the exam in an unproctored, untimed, and unscored setting. As they go through the exam, they rate the likelihood of a candidate like them getting that question correct. The harder the question is perceived to be, the lower that percentage will be; a super-easy question might be given a 95% rating (because people still pick B accidentally instead of A), while the lowest grade, 25%, represents a pure guess on a question with 4 possible answers.

This was the approach we used to set the CIP passing score. Once the SMEs finished their ratings, we had a call to discuss them. Each item had a range of ratings and we discussed the individual ratings of those items with large ranges. We looked at the complexity of the individual item, how the beta testers answered, and how well those questions discriminated (good scorers tended to get them right, poor scorers tended to get them wrong). SMEs were allowed to change their ratings after discussion and many did on many items. This ended up with each item having a difficulty rating and a statistical validity associated with that rating. We then took all the individual items and assembled the final passing score range of 47-51 items which equates to a 55-60% passing score and set the passing score at the top of that mathematically determined, defensible, range.

So back to that 60% passing score: 60% seems quite low, right? But it's exactly the opposite: a 60% passing score reflects that the exam is actually harder compared to the previous CIP. Had we put the passing score at 70%, only about half the beta candidates would have passed, many of whom are superior candidates compared to the 3-5 year candidate that the CIP has targeted since its inception.

And in part because the exam is more challenging, we've already developed an in-depth CIP study guide and an instructor-led classroom prep workshop to help candidates prepare to succeed on the exam. The study guide is free for AIIM Professional members and $60 for non-members. The revised CIP is also more closely aligned to existing AIIM training programs; taking one of them will also help prepare candidates for the relevant portion of the CIP.

We will definitely monitor the performance of the CIP, and if the passing score needs to be tweaked  in 6 months or a year we have a process for doing that as well. But I hope this information will underscore my, and AIIM's, commitment to doing the CIP the right way, not simply throwing together a bunch of questions and setting an arbitrary passing score. 
Epicurious: Diner-Style Bacon for a Crowd. Because why wouldn't you?

June 8, 2016

Global News/The Canadian Press: Personal email, BBMs subject to records requests, watchdog tells public servants H/T: Tara Dragon.


Chris Walker: Three's Company
Laurence Hart: Content Management, Platforms or Solutions?


BMOC: Will ECM vendors catch up to Back Office Content Solutions? 


CIP update: Setting the passing score

As I mentioned in my previous post, we're almost done with what needs to be done to revise the CIP. We had a call this week with several subject matter experts (SMEs) who reviewed the beta results and made some determinations as to some of the items. I'm working this week to incorporate those changes, fix some typos, etc.

But we still need your help! We need 10-12 more SMEs for the final activity, setting the passing score. You do not need to be a member of AIIM *or* a CIP to assist, though we will give preference to CIPs. But you do need to be someone who could be a CIP if you aren't - preferably with no more than 5 years experience in the relevant domains. In other words, if you've been doing this since Methuselah, you're not the ideal candidate this time around.

Here's what we need. We have a training call scheduled for Tuesday, June 14, from 10:30 am to 12:30 pm Eastern Daylight Time. This call is to train the SMEs on how to do the scoring activities. Once that training call is done, SMEs will be taking the exam and deciding, for each exam question, how likely it is that someone like them, with 3-5 years experience, perhaps a CIP, perhaps not, would get the question right. Some questions will be easy, some will be hard. Once the SME has scored all the questions, we do some final analysis to end up at the final passing score. This in turn will be used to determine which beta CIP candidates passed and are full CIPs.

Important: Whether you are a CIP already or not, this will not impact your status. In other words, don't be concerned about "passing" the exam - if you're already a CIP you will stay a CIP as long as you do the recertification process. If you're selected and not yet a CIP, this will not impact you at all. You will also not be charged to participate in this process. You do not need to study - again, the point is to determine the difficulty of the items, not to try to "pass".

SMEs who are selected to participate in this final activity will also receive a free voucher good for one CIP exam once the final exam goes live. Those who participated on this week's call will receive a voucher as well. These vouchers are transferrable so you can give them to a colleague or use them yourself.

If you are interested, or know someone that you think would be a good candidate, please contact me directly at jwilkins@aiim.org.

June 5, 2016

FCW: Social confusion: Looming records mandates and social media. This has been near and dear to my heart for more than a decade - in fact I wrote the AIIM Social Media Governance course in 2008.

I've spoken recently on the topic, at ARMA Wyoming and ARMA Boston among others, and this article makes a key point with which I agree wholeheartedly: for social media, and for most communications technologies, automation is the only way to do it to ensure appropriate content is captured.

And this article, which was written by Austin Adams, VP of Public Sector, Alfresco, is another great example of how solution providers can provide truly educational content that demonstrates their expertise both generally and specific to particular circumstances.

June 2, 2016

CIP status update - POST-BETA

The CIP beta has come to a close. THANK YOU for everyone who participated - you play a key role in the CIP revision including perhaps the most important step: setting the passing score.

Many people who participated in the beta test have asked me about their scores, when they would receive them, when they would know whether they passed, etc. To them I say - soon. Sometime in June, most likely the week of June 20, but I still don't have an exact date. Let me explain.

Now that the beta is over, the next step is for Kryterion to do some statistical analysis of the questions on the beta to determine how they performed. Without getting into too much detail, we want there to be a correlation between what a CIP candidate answers on a given question and how that CIP candidate does overall. So if someone gets a particular question wrong, but gets 95% of the remaining questions right, that raises an issue. And if someone gets the same question right, but gets 90% of the remaining questions wrong, that also raises an issue. That's what we're looking for this week.

We have a call scheduled for next week with a small group of subject matter experts (SMEs) who will review any and all problematic questions and make recommendations as to whether/how to fix them or even to remove them entirely.

Once that's done, we have a larger group of SMEs who will participate an an exercise called modified Angoff scoring. Again, without getting into too much detail, the SMEs will make a determination as to how hard each question is. Once we have that done for each item, we put together the final exam and those scores will lead us to the final passing score.

At that time we will apply that to all of the beta candidates' scores and notify everyone. Those who passed will be CIPs just as if they'd taken the original exam or the updated final exam. Those who did not pass will be able to take the final CIP again at the regular exam price of $285 for Professional members and $349 for non-members. As with the previous CIP exam, candidates who take the final exam will get their score and pass/fail immediately upon completion of the exam.

So keep watching this space - we will announce the final passing score here as well as the general availability of the revised CIP study guide and training course. And as always feel free to direct any questions to me directly at jwilkins@aiim.org.

May 11, 2016

OT: Musing about future dates & events

I've been at AIIM 5 1/2 years as of this Sunday. This marks my third longest tenure with a single organization and my longest performing substantially the same duties. I'm not particularly looking to leave - love my team and the AIIM staff at large, enjoy what I do, and as a full-time teleworker since 2004, what's not to like?

All that said, is it hubristic of me to think about scheduling time off / scheduling around certain events I want to attend for 2017? I never used to think about planning further than about a quarter out, because you just never know. Maybe it's my old age catching up to me, or the fact that as lean as we are I do feel a certain amount of job security. Which now means that karma's gonna get me....

Anyway, I think as we start to look at scheduling for 2017, which we typically don't do for my stuff until Q3 or so, I'm going to be a bit more proactive in blocking out time for some of the events I used to go to but haven't because of scheduling conflicts. Things like ARMA Canada, and ARMA Houston, and maybe some of the training and/or association events, and at least one big SharePoint conference. Here's to me. :)

May 3, 2016

AIIM has posted all of the AIIM Conference 2016 presentations as PDFs to Slideshare; all of them are posted by date in one spot on the AIIM blog.

May 2, 2016

Kevin Parker: Reflections on the 2016 AIIM Conference

The CIP Beta is Live!

Updated to reflect final beta date of May 31, 2016.

Updated to add correct link to the registration process.

I am pleased to announce that the beta exam is live for the CIP 2016 update. So what's that mean?

The CIP has to go through a beta process in order to set a defensible passing score. We need 100+ candidates for each of the two beta forms. Once we have those exam results we can analyze the individual items to ensure they meet our standards; we will also set the passing score using the modified Angoff scoring mechanism.

The beta is the same as the "regular" CIP and those who pass the beta will be full CIPs. The primary differences are:

  • The price, as shown below
  • The exam is 3 hours, rather than 2, to give candidates time to provide comments on each question if so desired
  • You will have to wait until the beta is over to get your score

How can you register? Simply go to http://www.webassessor.com/aiim/index.html, create an account, and follow the registration process. We have documented that process in a Word document which you can access here: https://myaiim.box.com/s/lj4t21jocktku7rzfatlazalbeye8j9h

This link is to the final CIP outline: https://myaiim.app.box.com/s/x26nmu6oxizdjugmht477e3drjs6cq33

Please note that the beta will only be available until May 23 or until we get the necessary registrations, whichever comes first. Update: the beta will remain live until May 31, 2016.

Cost of the beta is only $135. This is a massive discount from the full price of $285 for Professional members and $349 for non-members.

Please feel free to contact me directly with any questions at jwilkins@aiim.org.

April 11, 2016

SharePointMaven: 10 questions to ask your users before you create a SharePoint site for them
NYTimes: Swim. Bike. Cheat? This is a fascinating story because I do these types of events (albeit much, MUCH shorter distance) and I hate the idea of cheating on them because, as the story says, for most of us cheating on an event is cheating yourself.

But it's also fascinating because, on the one hand, many of the accusations are corroborated by metadata from the ubiquitous digital pictures taken throughout, and on the other hand, the accused could have provided significant data/metadata in her defense from her own GPS devices and hasn't.
Don Lueders: #ARMANextGen: Lipstick, Meet Pig


April 6, 2016

Update on the CIP 2016 exam development process

It's been a while since I've posted about the CIP. No news definitely means good news in this case! We've had more than 25 subject matter experts contribute questions towards the update, and right now we're working our way through more than 300 questions to make sure every question is as clear, correct, and concise as we can make them.

New Provider
When we made the decision to bring back the CIP, we also decided to look at other providers to see what other options were available in the marketplace. We've decided to change providers to Kryterion (https://www.kryteriononline.com/). We believe they offer the best combination of test centers and testing mechanisms for the revamped CIP and we're looking forward to working with them to help finalize the exam, including the beta exam.

The Beta Exam
The next step in the process to get candidates to take the beta exam. This will be available through Kryterion test centers in the next couple of weeks. We'll make a separate announcement through various channels once the beta exam is actually live. This is a critical part of the process because we need 100+ people to take each of the two exam forms in order to ensure the questions are correct and statistically valid.

The cost of the beta exam will be $135.00, which is a massive discount to the full price of the CIP exam once it goes live. This price will only be available until we get the minimum number of beta exams we need.

Candidates who take the beta exam are taking the CIP exam; the primary difference is that you will not receive your score, passing or otherwise, until we get the minimum number of beta exams. That in turn is what we use to set the final passing score. Once we set that final score we will contact every single beta exam candidate and provide their final score, the final passing score, and notification as to whether the candidate passed or failed the exam.

New Pricing
We also made the decision to increase the price of the CIP. There are a number of factors that went into this, including the cost of developing the new exam, the cost of similar sorts of exams in the marketplace, and the need to ensure that the CIP will be self-funding moving forward. Once the new exam is officially launched, the prices will be:
Professional Member: $285.00
Non-member: $349.00

However, the requirements and fees for maintenance will remain the same: 45 hours of continuing education (CEUs) over 3 years, plus a $75.00 fee for Professional Members and $150.00 fee for non-members.

Exam Prep Materials
We are also developing a preparatory course and training manual that will prepare candidates to take the CIP exam. We expect those to be available when the official exam launches. As with the previous CIP, a training class is not required, but candidates may benefit from taking a training class if they are unsure about a particular area of the exam. And unlike the previous CIP exam, taking AIIM training courses are also a great way to prepare for the various parts of the exam. Pricing and specific availability is still being determined and will be announced in the next few weeks.

Last Chance for LAPSED CIPs to Renew
Finally, one more reminder. If you completed the original CIP but let it lapse - that is, you didn't pay the CEU fee and complete the 45 hours of continuing education, we are offering a one-time grace period. Submit your documentation and pay any outstanding CEU fees by April 26, 2016, and you will be renewed and remain a CIP in good standing. Once this date passes, however, you will have to pass the test again at the applicable fee in order to remain a CIP.

Please feel free to contact me directly at jwilkins@aiim.org with any questions.

Update: fixed the link to Kryterion. Thanks to BMOC's Marko Sillanpää for spotting the error.

Update: changed last header to LAPSED CIPs. Current CIPs are current; this note was directed specifically to those who took the CIP but have not renewed it and have let it lapse.

February 26, 2016

Harvard Business Review: Before a Meeting, Tell Your Team that Silence Denotes Agreement. I agree with the point; not sure that making that statement will completely take care of it, but it does feel like a good way to at least get some feedback.

February 24, 2016

Activity: Walking desk, 2.2 mph pace, 8.0% incline, 1:23, 3.1 miles.